Home / Case Studies / Healthcare Nutanix Private Cloud
Case Study · Healthcare · Private Cloud (Nutanix)

A multi-site healthcare group modernised critical VMware workloads on a resilient Nutanix private cloud

A multi-site healthcare group needed to modernise the VMware-based infrastructure supporting practice-management and clinical systems, imaging, file services, SQL/database workloads, Microsoft services, users and branch operations. The decision was not simply whether to refresh hardware or move everything to public cloud — the organisation needed resilience, manageability, predictable performance and private-cloud control for workloads where clinical availability, application dependency, data control, recovery confidence and operational supportability all mattered.

Inlight IT helped design and deploy a multi-node Nutanix private cloud platform, with Veeam backup and recovery integrated into the operating model. The result was a more resilient, manageable and supportable foundation for clinical and business-critical systems, without forcing workloads into a public-cloud model where private cloud was the better operational fit.

LEGACY PLATFORMMODERNISEPRIVATE CLOUD MULTI-NODE PLATFORM VMWARE ESTATEWORKLOAD-FIRSTRESILIENT CLUSTER MULTI-SITE HEALTHCARE / PRIVATE CLOUD / NUTANIX MULTI-NODE / ONE RESILIENT PLATFORM
Engagement at a glance

Multi-site healthcare group — Nutanix private cloud modernisation

A VMware-to-Nutanix infrastructure modernisation delivered workload first, with recovery designed in.

Client
Multi-site healthcare group
Industry
Healthcare (multi-site)
Environment
VMware-based infrastructure supporting practice-management and clinical systems, imaging, file services, SQL/database workloads, Microsoft services and branch operations
Starting point
An ageing VMware-based environment supporting clinical and business-critical systems
Engagement type
Nutanix private cloud design and deployment — workload assessment, multi-node platform architecture, migration sequencing, Veeam backup and recovery integration, and operational handover
Platform
Multi-node Nutanix private cloud with Veeam backup and recovery integrated into the operating model
Outcome
A more resilient, manageable and supportable private cloud platform for clinical and business-critical workloads
Key project stats

A platform matched to workload and operating model

VMware
to Nutanix

Core workloads moved from an ageing VMware-based environment onto a modern Nutanix private cloud platform.

Multi-node
platform resilience

Platform architecture designed around high availability, predictable performance and supportability.

5
workload families

Practice-management and clinical systems, imaging, file services, SQL/database workloads and Microsoft services.

Veeam
recovery by design

Backup and recovery integrated into the infrastructure design, not added as a separate afterthought.

Operating context

The organisation needed to modernise infrastructure without disrupting clinical and business-critical systems

This was not a simple hardware refresh. The existing VMware-based environment supported practice-management and clinical systems, imaging, file services, SQL/database workloads, Microsoft services, users, branch operations, backup dependencies, recovery requirements and support processes.

In healthcare environments, infrastructure decisions have operational consequence. If a clinical application is unavailable, if imaging or database workloads are unstable, if file services cannot be reached, or if recovery is unclear, the impact is not limited to IT — it affects staff, clinical workflows, administration and business continuity.

The objective was to modernise the platform while protecting the systems the organisation depended on every day. That meant starting with workloads, dependencies, recovery requirements, performance needs and supportability before finalising the Nutanix design.

Why this work mattered

Public cloud is right for many workloads — it is not right for every workload

The decision was not anti-cloud. It was workload placement. For this healthcare group, the right answer was a Nutanix-based private cloud foundation for workloads that needed high availability, predictable performance and clear recovery.

01

Workload placement, not platform ideology

Some systems are strong candidates for public cloud. Others are better served by a private-cloud platform where resilience, predictable performance, dependency management, data control and operating support are more directly controlled.

02

Clinical availability could not be put at risk

If a clinical application is unavailable, if imaging or database workloads are unstable, or if file services cannot be reached, the impact is not limited to IT — it affects staff, clinical workflows, administration and business continuity.

03

The platform had to be resilient and manageable

Nutanix was selected because the organisation needed a more resilient and manageable platform for clinical applications, imaging, file services, SQL/database workloads, Microsoft services and virtualised infrastructure.

04

Recovery had to be clear

The workloads needed high availability, predictable performance and clear recovery — with backup dependencies and recovery requirements understood before the design was finalised.

05

More than a host replacement

The value was not simply replacing VMware hosts — it was matching the platform to the workload and the operating model.

What Inlight IT delivered

A VMware-to-Nutanix infrastructure modernisation, delivered workload first

Inlight IT helped the organisation design and deploy a Nutanix-based private cloud platform by connecting workload assessment, multi-node cluster architecture, migration sequencing, Veeam backup and recovery integration, and operational handover into one infrastructure-modernisation programme.

01

Workloads came before the hardware specification

The engagement began with the systems the organisation actually depended on: practice-management and clinical systems, imaging, file services, SQL/database workloads, Microsoft services, shared infrastructure, backup dependencies and recovery requirements.

Included
Practice-management and clinical systemsImaging workloadsFile servicesSQL/database workloadsMicrosoft servicesBackup and recovery dependencies
02

Nutanix was designed around resilience and operating fit

The platform was architected around workload requirements, predictable performance, high availability, manageability and supportability rather than a like-for-like hardware replacement.

Included
Multi-node cluster architectureHigh availabilityPredictable performanceManageabilitySupportabilityNot like-for-like replacement
03

Migration was sequenced around clinical impact and dependency

Workloads were moved in a controlled sequence based on clinical importance, application dependency, recovery requirements and operational risk.

Included
Controlled sequenceClinical importanceApplication dependencyRecovery requirementsOperational risk
04

Veeam backup and recovery were integrated into the platform

Backup and recovery were treated as part of the infrastructure design, with Veeam integrated into the target operating model rather than added as a separate afterthought.

Included
Veeam backup and recoveryPart of the infrastructure designTarget operating modelRecovery confidenceNot an afterthought
05

The platform moved into supportable operation

The environment was handed into an operating model that could be managed, monitored, supported and improved after deployment.

Included
Operational handoverManaged and monitoredDay-two supportImproved over timeSupportable operating model
Delivery approach

From VMware estate to supportable Nutanix private cloud

Select a stage to trace how the programme moved from workload assessment to supportable operation.

Market context

Not all workloads belong in public cloud

The decision was not anti-cloud — it was workload placement. Some systems are strong candidates for public cloud; others are better served by a private-cloud platform where resilience, predictable performance, dependency management, data control and operating support are more directly controlled. For this healthcare group, the right answer was a Nutanix-based private cloud foundation for workloads that needed high availability, predictable performance and clear recovery.

5

Five workload families placed deliberately: practice-management and clinical systems, imaging, file services, SQL/database workloads and Microsoft services.

Multi-node

Resilience designed into the platform architecture for the clinical and business-critical systems the organisation depended on every day.

1

One infrastructure-modernisation programme connected workload assessment, architecture, migration sequencing, backup integration and handover.

Day 2

The platform was designed for day-two support — managed, monitored and improved after deployment.

Multi-site healthcare engagementInlight IT delivery record
What changed for the client

Critical healthcare workloads had a more resilient and supportable platform

The deployment was structured to balance infrastructure-modernisation discipline with healthcare continuity. The aim was not simply to complete a migration — it was to leave the organisation with a more resilient private-cloud platform that could be operated with confidence.

O·01

Critical workloads had a clearer platform home

Practice-management, clinical, imaging, file service, SQL/database and Microsoft workloads were placed on a platform designed around their availability, performance, recovery and support requirements.

O·02

VMware dependency was reduced

The organisation moved core workloads from its VMware-based environment onto a more modern Nutanix private cloud platform.

O·03

Resilience improved

The multi-node Nutanix platform improved resilience for the clinical and business-critical systems the organisation depended on.

O·04

Recovery was designed into the platform

Veeam backup and recovery were integrated into the infrastructure design rather than treated as a separate afterthought.

O·05

Infrastructure became easier to manage

The Nutanix platform gave the organisation a more manageable and supportable private-cloud foundation.

O·06

The environment became more supportable

The deployment moved into an operating model that could be monitored, supported and improved over time.

Net position

The value was not simply replacing VMware hosts — it was matching the platform to the workload and the operating model.

Project outcomes

Infrastructure modernisation as workload placement, not hardware refresh

Outcome 01

VMware modernisation

Core workloads moved from an ageing VMware-based environment.

Outcome 02

Workload-first

Design began with clinical and business-critical systems, not the hardware bill of materials.

Outcome 03

Nutanix private cloud

A resilient platform for workloads that needed predictable performance and local control.

Outcome 04

Multi-node resilience

Platform architecture designed around availability and supportability.

Outcome 05

Recovery by design

Veeam backup and recovery integrated into the operating model.

Outcome 06

Supportable operation

Handover into a managed model that could be improved over time.

Technology and service scope

The work connected private cloud architecture, workload migration and recovery by design

Platform and architecture

6
  • Nutanix
  • Private cloud
  • Hyperconverged infrastructure
  • Multi-node resilience
  • High availability
  • Predictable performance

Workloads

6
  • Practice-management systems
  • Clinical applications
  • Imaging workloads
  • SQL/database workloads
  • File services
  • Microsoft services

Migration and modernisation

6
  • VMware modernisation
  • Infrastructure modernisation
  • Workload assessment
  • Migration sequencing
  • Dependency review
  • Controlled migration sequence

Recovery and operations

6
  • Veeam backup and recovery
  • Recovery integration
  • Operational handover
  • Day-two support
  • Monitoring and management
  • Supportable operating model
Practical next step

Need a more resilient platform for critical workloads?

We review your infrastructure and platform options before ageing systems constrain operations.

Discuss infrastructure refresh