Home / Case Studies / PPK VMware Exit
Case Study · Mining Equipment · VMware Exit · Azure Local · Newcastle NSW

PPK exited VMware and moved to Azure Local after Broadcom renewal pressure changed the platform decision

PPK Mining Equipment operates in the Newcastle industrial corridor, supporting mining and industrial customers through specialist equipment, service and operational capability. When Broadcom's VMware renewal model changed the economics of staying on VMware, PPK needed more than a licence response. The business needed a structured infrastructure decision: whether to renew, reduce, bridge, migrate to public cloud, or replace VMware with a supportable local platform.

Inlight IT reviewed PPK's three-node VMware estate, assessed six landing paths, selected Azure Local, planned the migration and delivered the exit. More than 20 virtual server workloads were reviewed and migrated, with backup, recovery, cutover sequencing and post-migration support included in the scope. The outcome was a controlled VMware exit: renewal exposure removed, Azure Local established as the new platform, backup aligned to the new environment, and the estate brought into managed support after cutover.

VMWARE ESTATEOPTIONSLANDING LANDING DECISION SELECTED PATHAZURE LOCAL 6 ASSESSED PPK / MINING EQUIPMENT & INDUSTRIAL SERVICES / VMWARE EXIT SIX PATHS / ONE LANDING
Engagement at a glance

PPK Mining Equipment — VMware exit to Azure Local

A structured infrastructure decision delivered from estate review through to managed support.

Client
PPK Mining Equipment
Industry
Mining equipment and industrial services
Location
Newcastle industrial corridor
Starting point
Three-node VMware estate facing Broadcom subscription renewal pressure
Engagement type
VMware estate review, six-path landing assessment, Azure Local migration, backup alignment and managed support
Workload scope
More than 20 virtual server workloads reviewed and migrated, with backup, recovery, cutover sequencing and post-migration support in scope
Platform outcome
Azure Local established as the retained local platform, with backup and day-two support included
Key project stats

Six paths assessed, one controlled exit

3
node VMware estate

The existing estate — hosts, lifecycle, VM footprint and the dependencies behind the workloads — reviewed before any platform decision was made.

20+
workloads migrated

More than 20 virtual server workloads assessed and migrated through controlled sequencing.

6
landing paths compared

Renew, reduce, bridge with AVS, public-cloud migration, Nutanix and Azure Local — assessed so the decision was made on fit, not default.

1
retained local platform

Azure Local selected as a Microsoft-aligned local platform for retained workloads, with a clearer path to hybrid management.

Operating context

For an industrial business, a VMware renewal is not just a licence event — it is the moment the platform direction gets tested

PPK Mining Equipment runs in an industrial environment where technology supports communication, access to business systems, operational coordination, customer response and continuity.

Broadcom renewal pressure created the decision point. Staying on VMware may have been possible, but it needed to be justified. Exiting VMware was also possible, but only if the migration path protected workloads, dependencies, backup and day-two support.

Inlight IT treated the work as a platform decision, not a licensing reaction.

Why this work mattered

PPK needed to exit VMware without turning renewal pressure into migration risk

VMware renewal shock can push a business to move quickly. The risk is moving too quickly in the wrong way. For PPK, the exit needed to be structured around workloads, dependencies, backup, cutover and support after migration.

01

The decision needed structure, not reaction

PPK needed more than a licence response. The business needed a structured infrastructure decision: whether to renew, reduce, bridge, migrate to public cloud, or replace VMware with a supportable local platform.

02

The renewal had become a platform question

Broadcom completed its acquisition of VMware in November 2023, then shifted to subscription licensing, including the end of sale of perpetual licences and Support and Subscription renewals for perpetual offerings. That changed many VMware renewals from routine licence events into broader infrastructure decisions.

03

Not every workload needed a public-cloud landing

PPK needed to exit VMware, but the estate still needed local control, predictable access, supportable infrastructure and clear backup alignment. A blanket public-cloud move was not the right answer for every workload.

04

The exit had to protect backup and recovery

More than 20 virtual server workloads had to move with backup, recovery and dependency continuity intact. A platform change that left recovery unclear would not have been a credible exit.

05

Day-two support had to be part of the plan

The migration was only complete if the new platform could be operated and supported after cutover, not just stood up.

What Inlight IT delivered

A VMware exit to Azure Local delivered through assessment, migration planning, backup alignment and controlled cutover

Inlight IT structured the project across five delivery streams. Each stream reduced a different migration risk, and the project deliberately avoided premature platform selection.

01

Estate review

The project started by understanding what PPK was actually running — the three-node VMware estate, host lifecycle, VM footprint and the dependencies behind the workloads.

Included
Three-node estate reviewHost lifecycle reviewVM footprintDependency discoveryNo premature platform selectionDecision-ready evidence
02

Workload mapping

The workloads were assessed before migration sequencing began, so dependencies, performance needs and migration risk were understood per workload rather than assumed.

Included
Per-workload assessmentDependency mappingPerformance needsMigration risk per workload20+ virtual server workloadsSequencing inputs
03

Platform comparison

Azure Local was selected after the realistic options were assessed — renew, reduce, bridge with AVS, public-cloud migration, Nutanix and Azure Local — so the decision was made on fit, not default.

Included
Six landing pathsRenew and reduce optionsBridge with AVSPublic-cloud assessmentNutanix assessmentAzure Local selectionFit over default
04

Azure Local migration planning

The VMware exit moved from review into execution, with migration sequencing, cutover windows and rollback considered before production change.

Included
Migration sequencingCutover windowsRollback planningControlled executionProduction-change disciplineCutover sequencing
05

Backup and managed support alignment

Backup and day-two operations were included in the migration scope, so recovery was aligned to the new platform and the estate came into managed support after cutover.

Included
Backup alignmentRecovery validationDay-two operationsManaged support after cutoverSupportable platformPost-migration support
Delivery approach

From renewal pressure to a controlled platform decision

Select a stage to trace how renewal pressure became a controlled exit to Azure Local.

Market context

VMware renewal pressure has turned virtualisation into a platform decision

Broadcom completed its acquisition of VMware in November 2023. VMware by Broadcom then announced a shift to subscription licensing, including the end of sale of perpetual licences and Support and Subscription renewals for perpetual offerings. That changed many VMware renewals from routine licence events into broader infrastructure decisions — which is exactly the position PPK faced.

Nov 2023

Broadcom completed its acquisition of VMware, then shifted to subscription licensing and ended the sale of perpetual licences.

6

Landing paths assessed against the estate before Azure Local was selected — the decision made on fit, not default.

20+

Virtual server workloads moved with backup, recovery and dependency continuity intact.

3

Node VMware estate reviewed before any landing path was selected.

VMware by Broadcom licensing announcementsPPK platform assessmentInlight IT delivery record
What changed for the client

PPK exited VMware and moved to Azure Local through a controlled platform decision

The project moved PPK from VMware renewal pressure to a clearer Azure Local operating model. The business avoided renewing by inertia, avoided a rushed platform decision, and completed the migration with workload fit, backup, recovery and supportability considered.

O·01

Renewal exposure removed

The VMware subscription renewal pressure no longer dictated the platform direction.

O·02

Azure Local established

A Microsoft-aligned local platform was stood up for retained workloads, with a clearer path to hybrid management.

O·03

Backup aligned to the new platform

Recovery was re-aligned to Azure Local rather than left attached to the old environment.

O·04

Brought into managed support

The estate moved into ongoing managed support after cutover, so day-two operations had an owner.

O·05

Cutover planned with rollback in mind

Migration sequencing, cutover windows and rollback were considered before production change.

O·06

Workloads moved with dependencies understood

Dependencies, performance needs and migration risk were understood per workload rather than assumed.

Net position

The business avoided renewing by inertia, avoided a rushed platform decision, and completed the migration with workload fit, backup, recovery and supportability considered.

Project outcomes

A VMware exit delivered as a platform decision, not a licensing reaction

Outcome 01

Newcastle industrial operating context

Platform decision aligned to PPK's Newcastle industrial environment.

Outcome 02

Three-node VMware estate reviewed

The existing estate was assessed before any landing path was selected.

Outcome 03

Six landing paths compared

Renew, reduce, bridge, public cloud, Nutanix and Azure Local were assessed against the estate.

Outcome 04

20+ workloads migrated

More than 20 virtual server workloads moved through controlled sequencing.

Outcome 05

Backup and recovery aligned

Backup was re-aligned to Azure Local as part of the migration scope.

Outcome 06

Managed support after cutover

Day-two operations were included so the new platform stayed supportable.

Technology and service scope

The work connected platform assessment, controlled migration and day-two support

Platform decision

6
  • VMware exit
  • Broadcom renewal response
  • HCI platform selection
  • Six-path landing assessment
  • Azure Local
  • Nutanix and public cloud assessed

Assessment and planning

6
  • Estate review
  • Workload assessment
  • Dependency mapping
  • Migration planning
  • Cutover sequencing
  • Rollback planning

Backup and recovery

6
  • Backup alignment
  • Recovery validation
  • Dependency continuity
  • Recovery re-aligned to Azure Local
  • Backup in migration scope
  • Credible exit criteria

Operations after cutover

6
  • Managed infrastructure support
  • Day-two operations
  • Post-migration support
  • Hybrid management pathway
  • Supportable local platform
  • Renewal exposure removed
Practical next step

Is your VMware renewal forcing a bigger infrastructure decision?

We assess your VMware estate, workload placement and target platform ahead of renewal.

Discuss infrastructure refresh