Home / Case Studies / VLI Conveyors Backup and Recovery
Case Study · Materials Handling · Backup and Recovery

VLI Conveyors strengthened its backup and recovery posture across the business data behind industrial operations

VLI Conveyors operates in the mining and materials handling sector, supplying conveyor-related products and components for industrial environments. For a business like VLI Conveyors, backup is not only an IT safeguard. It protects the data and systems that support customer response, supplier coordination, operational records, finance activity, Microsoft 365, shared files and day-to-day business continuity.

Inlight IT supported VLI Conveyors by treating backup as part of the managed IT operating model — visibility, coverage, restore pathways, risk areas and ongoing improvement considered together rather than treated as separate problems.

SOURCE DATAREPLICATIONVAULT REPLICATION / RESTORE PATH LIVE DATAM365 + FILESIMMUTABLE VAULTRESTORE VLI / MATERIALS HANDLING & CONVEYORS / BACKUP COVERAGE · RESTORE · RESILIENCE
Engagement at a glance

VLI Conveyors — backup and recovery for industrial operations

How backup posture was reviewed across Microsoft 365, business systems, shared data and recovery resilience.

Client
VLI Conveyors
Industry
Materials handling and conveyor systems
Environment
Industrial business environment with users, business systems, Microsoft 365, shared files, supplier communication, operational records and recovery requirements
Starting point
Backup at risk of being treated as a set-and-forget tool rather than part of the operational resilience model
Engagement
Backup and recovery support within a managed IT relationship
Focus
Maintain backup visibility and recovery readiness across the systems and data that support day-to-day business operations
Outcome
A more controlled backup and recovery operating model, with coverage, restore pathways, escalation and improvement managed as part of ongoing IT support
Key project stats

Five backup workstreams inside one managed operating model

5
backup workstreams

Coverage review, Microsoft 365 recovery, restore pathways, recovery resilience and managed backup operation — considered together rather than treated as separate problems.

4
Microsoft 365 workloads

Exchange Online, OneDrive, SharePoint and Teams data treated as part of recovery planning, not assumed to be fully covered by platform resilience.

6
posture shifts

Clearer scope, Microsoft 365 in recovery thinking, restore ownership, a cyber-lens review, support-rhythm visibility and recovery planning tied to operational impact.

1
operating model

Backup, restore pathways, escalation and improvement managed as part of ongoing IT support rather than as a standalone tool.

Operating context

Backup only matters if the business can recover what it needs, when it needs it

Industrial businesses often depend on a combination of Microsoft 365, shared files, line-of-business systems, supplier records, operational documents and finance data. If those systems are unavailable or data is lost, the impact is practical — users cannot work, suppliers cannot be coordinated, records cannot be accessed and customer response slows.

For VLI Conveyors, backup needed to protect the data and systems behind everyday operations.

The value was not only having backup in place. The value was knowing what was protected, how recovery would work, what risk remained and how backup would stay visible as the environment changed.

Why this work mattered

VLI Conveyors needed backup visibility that matched the way an industrial business actually operates

Backup systems can appear healthy while still leaving recovery gaps. Jobs can run, dashboards can look normal and cloud platforms can be assumed to be protected. The real question is whether the business can restore the right data, from the right point in time, through a process that is understood.

01

Microsoft 365 data needed explicit backup consideration

Microsoft 365 supports email, collaboration, user files and shared information. Many organisations assume Microsoft automatically provides full business-grade backup for all recovery scenarios. In practice, Microsoft 365 resilience and Microsoft 365 backup are different things — the platform needed to be considered as part of the broader recovery posture, not treated as automatically covered.

02

Operational records and shared data needed continuity

Industrial businesses rely on documents, records, supplier information, finance data and operational files. These can sit across local systems, cloud platforms and shared repositories. Backup coverage needed to be considered around business importance, not only storage location.

03

Recovery needed to be understood before disruption

A backup is only useful when the restore process is known. The business needed clarity around what could be restored, how recovery would be initiated, who would own the process and where escalation would occur.

04

Cyber attack changed the backup requirement

Modern cyber attacks do not only encrypt production data. They can target backup repositories, administrator accounts and recovery paths. Backup needed to be considered alongside identity, access control, endpoint security, patching and privileged access, not treated as a separate tool.

05

Backup needed ongoing ownership

Backup posture changes as users, systems, permissions, cloud data and business processes change. Without ongoing review, coverage can drift away from the real environment. The managed IT model needed to keep backup visible after the initial configuration.

What Inlight IT delivered

Backup and recovery support connected to Microsoft 365, business systems and operational resilience

Inlight IT structured the engagement around backup coverage, recovery ownership, Microsoft 365 considerations, cyber attack exposure and ongoing support — backup considered as part of the operating model rather than as a standalone tool.

01

Backup coverage review

Backup coverage reviewed around the systems and data that support business operations, with coverage gaps identified and practical improvement recommendations made.

Included
Microsoft 365 backup considerationsShared file and data coverageBusiness system dependenciesSchedule and retention reviewCoverage gap identificationImprovement recommendations
02

Microsoft 365 recovery considerations

Microsoft 365 data treated as part of recovery planning, not assumed to be fully covered by platform resilience — across email, files, collaboration and account compromise scenarios.

Included
Exchange Online recoveryOneDrive data protectionSharePoint data protectionTeams data considerationsRetention and deletion riskAccount compromise recoveryMailbox recovery pathways
03

Restore pathway and escalation

Restore pathway visibility supported so recovery requests could be handled with clearer ownership and escalation.

Included
Restore process awarenessRecovery request pathwayBusiness-priority dataRecovery ownershipRestore validationUser communication
04

Recovery resilience considerations

Backup reviewed through an attacker lens — repository protection, access control and recovery readiness considered alongside broader cyber-first controls.

Included
Backup access controlPrivileged account exposureRepository protectionOffsite and separationRecovery readiness pathwaysMonitoring and alertingCyber-first alignment
05

Managed backup operation

Backup brought into the managed IT rhythm so coverage and risk could be reviewed over time rather than left at the initial configuration.

Included
Backup monitoring awarenessJob status and alert reviewBackup issue escalationCoverage review over timeService review discussionManaged IT alignment
Delivery approach

Five stages, from backup visibility to managed support

Select a stage to trace how backup moved from visibility to managed support.

Market context

Backup posture has moved from IT hygiene to business continuity

Cyber attack, accidental deletion, cloud data loss, account compromise, supplier disruption and user error all make backup a business continuity issue. Cloud data is not automatically a full backup strategy — Microsoft 365 provides platform resilience, but organisations still need to consider retention, accidental deletion, malicious deletion, account compromise and point-in-time recovery. Attackers target recovery paths as well as production, and cyber insurers often ask about backup coverage, restore testing, offsite copies, access control and recovery readiness — questions that move backup from operational tool to assurance artefact.

5

Five backup workstreams — coverage, Microsoft 365 recovery, restore pathways, recovery resilience and managed operation — considered together.

4

Four Microsoft 365 workloads — Exchange Online, OneDrive, SharePoint and Teams — included in recovery thinking rather than assumed covered.

6

Six practical shifts in backup posture, from clearer scope to recovery planning tied to operational impact.

1

One operating model — backup managed inside ongoing IT support rather than as a standalone tool.

VLI Conveyors engagementInlight IT delivery record
What changed for the client

VLI Conveyors gained a clearer backup and recovery posture for its industrial operating environment

The engagement moved backup from a set-and-forget tool to part of the operational resilience model. The business gained a more controlled view of what was protected, how recovery would work and how backup would remain aligned to the operating environment over time.

O·01

Backup scope became clearer

The business had a more practical view of what systems, files and cloud data were considered in the backup and recovery posture.

O·02

Microsoft 365 data was included in recovery thinking

Microsoft 365 data was considered as part of business continuity, not assumed to be fully recoverable by default.

O·03

Restore ownership became clearer

The engagement helped clarify how recovery requests would be handled, who would own escalation and which data mattered most.

O·04

Backup was reviewed through a cyber lens

Backup posture was considered alongside privileged access, account compromise, repository protection and recovery readiness risk.

O·05

Backup visibility moved into the support rhythm

Backup monitoring awareness, escalation and improvement planning became part of the managed IT operating model.

O·06

Recovery planning was tied to operational impact

Backup priorities were considered around the practical effect of data loss or system unavailability on business coordination.

Net position

For VLI Conveyors, backup was not only about preventing data loss. It was about preserving the ability to coordinate work, access records, respond to customers, manage suppliers and recover from disruption with less uncertainty.

Project outcomes

Backup considered through the lens of recovery, not just storage

Outcome 01

Materials handling context

Backup posture considered for a mining and materials handling business.

Outcome 02

Cloud data considered

Microsoft 365 data included in the backup and recovery conversation.

Outcome 03

Operational data protected

Backup review focused on data and systems that support day-to-day business activity.

Outcome 04

Restore pathways clarified

Backup considered through the lens of recovery, ownership and escalation.

Outcome 05

Recovery resilience considered

Backup reviewed alongside identity, privilege, endpoint and cyber insurance expectations.

Outcome 06

Ongoing visibility included

Backup brought into managed IT review and improvement.

Technology and service scope

The work connected backup coverage, Microsoft 365 recovery and managed resilience

Backup coverage

6
  • Backup and recovery support
  • Shared data backup review
  • Business system backup awareness
  • Schedule and retention review
  • Coverage gap identification
  • Improvement recommendations

Microsoft 365 recovery

7
  • Microsoft 365 backup considerations
  • Exchange Online recovery
  • OneDrive protection
  • SharePoint protection
  • Teams data considerations
  • Account compromise recovery
  • Mailbox recovery pathways

Recovery resilience

6
  • Backup access control
  • Repository protection
  • Offsite and separation considerations
  • Privileged access awareness
  • Cyber insurance backup evidence
  • Recovery readiness considerations

Managed operation

6
  • Backup monitoring awareness
  • Restore pathway review
  • Managed backup escalation
  • Recovery improvement planning
  • Service review discussions
  • Managed IT alignment
Practical next step

Know what your business could actually recover

We test whether your backups actually recover, then close the gaps.

Discuss Backup & Disaster Recovery